Online safety training is legally sound if it is tailored to your own business and workplace, checks that employees have understood it and allows questions to a training person at any time. That is what DGUV Rule 100-001 says. The law prescribes no particular form, but clicking through generic slides does not meet the duty.
Safety training (Unterweisung) is the explanation of hazards and protective measures required by section 12 ArbSchG, aimed specifically at the employee's workplace or area of work. Deadlines, content and duties overall are covered in the main article Safety training in the office. This article asks when the digital route holds up and where it ends. For home office and mobile work there is a separate article: Online safety training and home office.
What do the law and DGUV require of online safety training?
Neither the Occupational Safety and Health Act nor DGUV Regulation 1 regulates the form of training. DGUV Rule 100-001 requires personal training in section 2.3.1 but allows electronic aids as long as workplace relevance, a comprehension check and the chance to ask questions are secured. Electronic training is therefore permitted, self-study without a contact person is not.
The duties at a glance:
- Section 12(1) ArbSchG: The employer trains employees sufficiently and appropriately, with instructions and explanations aimed specifically at the workplace. Training takes place during working hours.
- Section 4(1) DGUV Regulation 1: Training takes place before work starts and at least once a year afterwards, and is documented.
- Section 6(4) ArbStättV: Training is given in a form and language the employees understand.
- DGUV Rule 100-001, section 2.3.1: Questions must be possible, and with electronic aids a practical demonstration of individual procedures may additionally be needed.
DGUV puts it this way: electronic media can support training but do not replace the conversation.
Online vs. in-person training: what works digitally?
Anything that can be explained and checked with a question works online, for example hazards at the display screen workstation, behaviour in a fire or reporting routes for accidents. What has to be practised or shown stays on site. The decision depends on the content, not on the medium.
| Topic | Online possible? | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Hazards at the office workstation | yes | explainable, checkable with a control question |
| Accident reporting routes, naming first aiders | yes | business knowledge, checkable with a question |
| Behaviour in a fire, raising the alarm | yes | theory is easy to convey |
| Location of escape routes and assembly point | partly | module with floor plan, better with a short walk-through |
| Operating fire extinguishers (fire wardens) | no | practical exercise under section 10 ArbSchG needed |
| Work with hazardous substances | no, oral | section 14(2) GefStoffV requires oral training with signature |
| First training on day one | partly | prepare online, show the workplace on site |
| Annual refresher | yes | with business relevance and a channel for questions |
For the annual refresher in the office the online version is the normal case, for first training a mix makes sense. When the next training is due for each person is calculated by the training deadline calculator.
Live online, e-learning, video: which form is legally sound?
Live online training is training by video conference with a talk and questions in real time. An e-learning module, by contrast, is worked through alone at the computer at a different time. A recorded video training without control questions and without a contact person is the weakest form. The first two forms are permitted, the third only with additions.
| Form | Questions | Comprehension check | Typical risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live by video conference | direct | questions, poll | camera off, other work on the side |
| E-learning with test | via a named channel | automatic test | clicking through without business relevance |
| Recorded video | only with an extra channel | missing unless added | not sufficient without a check and a contact person |
The most common mistake is a generic bought-in module without your own content. Under section 12 ArbSchG training must be tied to the workplace. A module with photos of your own escape routes, the names of your first aiders and control questions such as "Where is our assembly point?" meets that, a standard course without this adaptation does not.
How to introduce online safety training in a legally sound way
Legally sound online training comes in six steps: define the content, make it specific to the business, check understanding, name a channel for questions, add practical parts on site and keep the record. If one step is missing, it remains open to challenge in an inspection by the employers' liability insurance association (Berufsgenossenschaft).
- Define the content. Derive from the risk assessment, for each group of activities, which hazards and measures the training must cover.
- Make it specific to the business. Add your own rooms, escape routes, first aiders, reporting routes and contact persons to generic modules.
- Check understanding. Ask control questions on each topic that refer to your own business and decide what happens after wrong answers.
- Name a channel for questions. Give a reachable person with name, time window and contact route and offer at least one live question session per round.
- Add practical parts on site. Walk the escape routes, run the extinguisher exercise and give the hazardous substances briefing in person.
- File the record and track deadlines. Store date, topics, module version, test result and confirmation for each person and remind those outstanding before the deadline.
Anyone who still has to build the foundation will find it in the article Risk assessment for the office workstation, and the route to records in 5 marks of audit-ready safety records.
What record belongs to online safety training?
The record of online training contains the same details as that of in-person training, plus the module version and the result of the comprehension check. Section 4 DGUV Regulation 1 requires documentation but no handwritten signature. A digital confirmation with date and topics is enough, except for hazardous substances under section 14(2) GefStoffV.
- Date of processing or of live attendance.
- Topics in detail and the module version, so it is clear later which version was taught.
- Result of the comprehension check and how wrong answers were handled.
- Name of the training person and the named channel for questions.
- Confirmation per person, for example a click with a timestamp in their own user account.
- Outstanding persons and the date of catching up.
What does the employers' liability insurance association look at in online training?
In an inspection by the Berufsgenossenschaft, what counts is proof that the training was effective. Typical questions concern the business relevance of the module, the comprehension check, the named contact person and catching up for absent people. Anyone who can show these four points from their records is in a good position. Which requirements apply in an individual case is set by the competent Berufsgenossenschaft, for office and administrative businesses usually the VBG.
In practice: the module, the questions and the attendance lists belong in a file that still shows the then-current version after a year.
Who has a say and what does it cost?
If the business has a works or staff council, involve it early. How training is arranged falls under co-determination on health protection under section 87(1) no. 7 BetrVG. A learning system that stores processing times and results per person can also touch co-determination on technical systems under section 87(1) no. 6 BetrVG. Data protection needs settling too: which results are stored and who sees them belongs in an agreement.
On effort, a worked example with set assumptions shows what shifts: 30 minutes of module per person, a 30-minute live question session, an in-person version of 60 minutes in groups of up to 20. The assumptions are set, not measured.
| Business | In person: sessions | In person: employee hours | Online: employee hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 employees | 1 | 12 | 6 plus question session |
| 45 employees | 3 | 45 | 22.5 plus question session |
| 140 employees | 7 | 140 | 70 plus question session |
The bigger advantage lies with catch-ups: with seven in-person sessions some people are always absent, while the module can be completed within the deadline. In return it has to be updated whenever the risk assessment changes. And under section 12(1) ArbSchG the processing time counts as working time.
Safety Club combines both: digital training with records and deadline reminders in the customer portal, and an occupational safety specialist on site who handles the in-person parts and questions. How getting started works is shown in the process in four steps.
This article is general guidance and does not replace legal advice on your individual case. What governs is the current version of the regulations cited, together with how your employers' liability insurance association (Berufsgenossenschaft, BG) interprets them.



